contemporarypainting

143 items found

778932636733374464

“You have to learn to be human first… before you can learn art.” — Silpa Bhirasri

This sentence conveys the idea that art is not just a technical skill or creative ability, but also something that deals with deep humanity, such as emotions, thoughts, spirit, experiences, and moral values. If an artist lacks an understanding of humanity—such as empathy, understanding the complexities of life, or having a broad and deep perspective—the art created may lack the true meaning of the dimension.

“Learning to be human” here can mean many things, such as:

  • Understanding oneself and one’s own emotions
  • Understanding society, culture, and history
  • Recognizing the suffering and joy of others
  • Developing empathy and ethical awareness

Great art often comes from communicating humanity on a deep level, whether it’s pain, hope, love, or the changes in life. Therefore, this sentence may serve as a reminder that art practice should not only be based on technique, but also on understanding life and humanity.

“พวกเธอต้องเรียนรู้ความเป็นมนุษย์ก่อน… ถึงจะเรียนศิลปะ” — ศิลป์ พีระศรี

ประโยคนี้สื่อถึงแนวคิดที่ว่าศิลปะไม่ใช่เพียงทักษะทางเทคนิคหรือความสามารถในการสร้างสรรค์เท่านั้น แต่ยังเป็นสิ่งที่เกี่ยวข้องกับความเป็นมนุษย์ในเชิงลึก เช่น อารมณ์ ความคิด จิตวิญญาณ ประสบการณ์ และคุณค่าทางศีลธรรม หากศิลปินขาดความเข้าใจในความเป็นมนุษย์—เช่น การเอาใจใส่ผู้อื่น การเข้าใจความซับซ้อนของชีวิต หรือการมีมุมมองที่กว้างและลึกซึ้ง—ศิลปะที่สร้างขึ้นอาจขาดมิติของความหมายที่แท้จริง

การ “เรียนรู้ความเป็นมนุษย์” ในที่นี้อาจหมายถึงหลายอย่าง เช่น

  • การเข้าใจตนเองและอารมณ์ของตัวเอง
  • การเข้าใจสังคม วัฒนธรรม และประวัติศาสตร์
  • การรับรู้ถึงความทุกข์และความสุขของผู้อื่น
  • การพัฒนาความเห็นอกเห็นใจและสำนึกทางจริยธรรม

ศิลปะที่ยิ่งใหญ่มักเกิดจากการสื่อสารความเป็นมนุษย์ในระดับที่ลึกซึ้ง ไม่ว่าจะเป็นความเจ็บปวด ความหวัง ความรัก หรือความเปลี่ยนแปลงของชีวิต ดังนั้น ประโยคนี้อาจเป็นการเตือนว่าการฝึกฝนศิลปะไม่ควรมีเพียงเทคนิคเพียงอย่างเดียว แต่ต้องมีความเข้าใจชีวิตและมนุษย์เป็นรากฐานด้วย

778861131566546944

donotdestroy:

Van Gogh sold one painting in his lifetime. Was he not an artist?

778558922029187072

“I still think science is looking for answers and art is looking for questions.”

Quinn sees the skeleton as representative of an everyman, an abstraction of a person since it is the part of the body which transcends death. The sculptures Angel and Waiting for Godot take the form of a praying skeleton and are an ironic reference to the idea of waiting for answers – or for some kind of external power to guide our life.

Marc Quinn
Waiting for Godot
2006
Patinated bronze
77h x 37w x 76.5d cm

777969080417304576

True

777829130358112256

Van Gogh sold one painting in his lifetime. Was he not an artist?

777810445838991360

“Abstract means literally to draw from or separate. In this sense every artist is abstract for he must create his own work from his visual impressions. A realistic or non-objective approach makes no difference. The result is what counts.”

Richard Diebenkorn (1922-1993)
Ocean Park #137
1985
oil and charcoal on canvas
100 x 81 in.
Price realised
USD 22,587,500

777654388488568832

CIA and Pollock Art

The CIA’s promotion of Jackson Pollock and Abstract Expressionism was part of a broader Cold War strategy to position the United States as a leader in cultural freedom and innovation, countering the Soviet Union’s emphasis on socialist realism. This was done covertly through the following methods:

1. Funding Through Front Organizations

The CIA used front organizations like the Congress for Cultural Freedom (CCF) (founded in 1950) to secretly fund art exhibitions, publications, and cultural events. The CCF was an international group that promoted Western culture and intellectual life, and it received financial backing from the CIA without the knowledge of most participants.

2. Sponsoring Exhibitions

The CIA, through the CCF and other groups, helped organize international art exhibitions showcasing American artists, including Pollock, Mark Rothko, and Willem de Kooning. One of the key exhibitions was “The New American Painting” (1958-1959), which traveled across Europe and was seen as a major moment in legitimizing Abstract Expressionism.

3. Support from Wealthy Patrons

The CIA also worked indirectly through influential figures in the art world, such as Nelson Rockefeller, who was a major supporter of modern art and had connections to the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA). MoMA itself played a key role in promoting Abstract Expressionism through exhibitions and acquisitions, with some scholars arguing that CIA funds may have indirectly supported these efforts.

4. Art as a Symbol of Freedom

Abstract Expressionism, with its emphasis on personal expression, was seen as the ultimate representation of freedom—an antidote to Soviet socialist realism, which depicted rigid, state-approved subjects. By elevating artists like Pollock, the CIA helped reinforce the idea that the U.S. valued creative liberty, which fit neatly into Cold War propaganda.

5. Influencing Art Critics and Publications

Art critics such as Clement Greenberg played a crucial role in promoting Abstract Expressionism as the pinnacle of modern art. Though there is no direct evidence that Greenberg was CIA-funded, his influence aligned with the agency’s goals. Magazines like Encounter, which was secretly funded by the CIA, also contributed to the spread of Abstract Expressionist ideas.

Did Pollock Know?

There is no evidence that Jackson Pollock (or other Abstract Expressionists) knew about the CIA’s involvement. The artists themselves were often left-leaning or even anti-establishment, which makes it ironic that their work was used as a Cold War propaganda tool.

Outcome

By the 1950s and 60s, Abstract Expressionism had become the dominant force in the art world, firmly establishing New York as the new center of modern art—overtaking Paris. This shift was largely due to the efforts of institutions that, in some cases, were backed by the CIA, whether directly or indirectly.

777538580458422272

“An artist fights to retain the integrity of a work so that it remains a strong, clear vision. Art is and should be the act of an individual willing to say something new, something not quite familiar.”

Maya Lin
Vietnam Veterans Memorial, 1982
National Mall, Washington D.C.

Sponsor: Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund
Architect of Record: Cooper-Lecky Partnership
Landscape Architect: Henry Arnold
Photography: Terry Adams, Mark Segal, Victoria Sambunaris, Wendy Watriss

777328301152829440

“Painting is self-discovery. Every good artist paints what he is.”

Jackson Pollock
Number 16
1949
oil and enamel on paper mounted on masonite
30¾ x 22¼ in.
Price realised
USD 32,645,000

777245839468953600

Estimated Representation of Asian Artists in Art History Books

Pre-20th Century (Before 1900s)

  • Western art history books: Less than 2%
  • Global art history books: 10–15% (including Chinese, Japanese, Indian, and Persian art)

20th Century (1900–1999)

  • Western-focused books: 3–5%
  • More globally aware books: 15–20%
  • Asian artists became more recognized in the contemporary period, especially post-1950s.

21st Century (2000–Present)

  • Traditional Western art books: 5–10%
  • Contemporary/global art books: 20–30%
  • With globalization, more Asian artists are included, particularly from China, Japan, Korea, and India.

Overall Estimate (From Past to Present)

  • Western-centric books: ~3–5% Asian artists across all periods.
  • Global/inclusive books: ~15–20%, rising in recent years.

776751430024478720

“A painting is not a picture of an experience, but is the experience.”

Mark Rothko
No. 10
1958
oil on canvas
94 ¼ x 69 ¼ in.
Price realised
USD 81,925,000

775747641573277696

“There are no rules. That is how art is born, how breakthroughs happen. Go against the rules or ignore the rules. That is what invention is about.”

Helen Frankenthaler
Elberta
1975
acrylic on canvas
79 x 97 in.
Price realised
USD 4,285,000

774845372804857856

“I am primarily painting from photographs these days (from illustrated magazines but also from family photos), in a sense this is a stylistic problem, the form is naturalistic, even though the photograph is not nature at all but a prefabricated product (the “second-hand world” in which we live), I do not have to intervene artistically with style, since the stylization (deformation in form and color) contributes only under very particular circumstances toward clarifying and intensifying an object or a subject (generally stylization becomes the central problem which obscures everything else (object, subject), it leads to an unmotivated artificiality, an untouchable formalist taboo.”

Gerhard Richter
Abstraktes Bild
signed, inscribed and dated ‘809-4 Richter 1994’ (on the reverse)
oil on canvas
88 5⁄8 x 78 3⁄4 in. (225 x 200 cm.)
Painted in 1994.
Price realised
USD 38,175,000

774712928735789056

Fine vs Decorative Art

If a painting is created mainly to match a luxurious interior rather than to express something deeply personal or challenge ideas, then it leans more toward decorative art, even if it’s technically a painting. It becomes part of the decor rather than a standalone statement.

That raises an interesting question—does the intent of the artist or the way the artwork is used define whether it’s fine art or decorative art? If someone paints with raw emotion and meaning but it ends up as a luxury wall piece, does that change what it is?

Especially with modern abstract painting—it’s everywhere in high-end homes, hotels, and corporate spaces. A lot of it seems designed to be aesthetically pleasing but not too thought-provoking, so it blends into the environment rather than demanding attention. It feels like abstraction has been commercialized into a luxury good rather than a form of deep expression, at least in many cases.

Of course, that doesn’t mean all abstract art today is purely decorative. There are still artists pushing boundaries and using abstraction in meaningful ways. But a lot of what sells seems to be more about fitting a vibe than saying something.

By ChatGPT