copyright
770123365912543232
Micro Cinema
Micro cinema itself is not inherently illegal. However, there are specific legal considerations you must adhere to when running a micro cinema, particularly around copyright laws and public performance rights.
Legal Aspects to Consider:
1. Public Performance Rights (PPR):
If you screen a film publicly (even to a small group in a micro cinema), you must obtain the rights from the film’s distributor, studio, or copyright holder. This applies to commercial films, independent films, and sometimes even short films.
2. Licensing Fees:
Distributors often charge licensing fees for public screenings, which depend on:
◦ The type of film
◦ Audience size
◦ Whether the event charges admission
3. Non-Profit or Educational Exceptions:
Some films allow free screenings for educational or non-commercial purposes, but you still need permission in writing.
4. Using Creative Commons or Public Domain Films:
To avoid legal issues, you can screen:
◦ Films under Creative Commons licenses (with proper attribution).
◦ Works in the public domain (no copyright restrictions).
◦ Films for which you’ve directly secured rights from the creators.
5. Private Screenings:
If the event is private (e.g., at home with friends), this generally does not require a license because it does not constitute a public performance.
What Makes It Illegal?
Micro cinema becomes illegal if you:
• Show copyrighted films without permission for public audiences.
• Charge admission without acquiring the appropriate rights.
• Fail to pay required licensing fees to the rights holders.
How to Stay Legal:
• Partner with local filmmakers who want exposure.
• Use film licensing services like Swank Motion Pictures or Criterion Pictures for public performance rights.
• Focus on films that are public domain or licensed for free distribution.
• Get written permission directly from independent filmmakers.
769656492236423168
“Stay true to yourself. An original is worth more than a copy.”
— Suzy Kassem
769586514339430401
“Why escape your intended purpose by copying and trying to be someone else? You will discover who you were meant to be only after you have shown confidence being yourself.”
— Suzy Kassem
756418885833621504
Nike Has Filed a $60M USD Lawsuit Against The Shoe Surgeon
“As the custom and bootleg market has continued to grow within the sneaker scene, Nike has responded by protecting its brand and IP via lawsuits against prominent parties ranging from Warren Lotas and John Geiger to BAPE and Kool Kiy. While the three aforementioned cases have all been settled, a new lawsuit has surfaced — one against The Shoe Surgeon. The suit demands $60M USD in damages — which, it notes, are ‘the profits the defendant generated from counterfeiting, trebled, along with attorneys’ fees’ — relating to over 30 Nike trademarks.”
753768026346749952
746122446526201856
745588485070749696
Anthony Joshua – Forever is made now