democracy

114 items found

802663356168388608

donotdestroy:

Politics on Social Media

People often talk about politics and defend or attack political beliefs—especially on social media—because politics is deeply tied to identity, values, and a sense of belonging. Here are a few reasons why it happens so often and so emotionally:

  1. Identity and Belonging: Political beliefs often align with core values and worldviews. When someone challenges those beliefs, it can feel like a personal attack, not just a disagreement.
  2. Tribalism: Humans naturally form groups. Politics can create an “us vs. them” mentality, where defending your side becomes a way of showing loyalty.
  3. Echo Chambers: Social media algorithms tend to show users content they already agree with. This reinforces existing beliefs and makes opposing views seem more extreme or threatening.
  4. Validation and Status: Expressing political views online can be a way to gain approval or respect from like-minded peers. It can also feel empowering to speak out, especially on controversial topics.
  5. Misinformation and Emotional Content: Political content that triggers strong emotions—anger, fear, outrage—gets more attention and shares. This fuels more reactionary and defensive behavior.
  6. Perceived Stakes: People often feel that political outcomes directly affect their rights, safety, or future. That sense of urgency makes discussions more intense.

By ChatGPT

801136618643783680

donotdestroy:

Politics on Social Media

People often talk about politics and defend or attack political beliefs—especially on social media—because politics is deeply tied to identity, values, and a sense of belonging. Here are a few reasons why it happens so often and so emotionally:

  1. Identity and Belonging: Political beliefs often align with core values and worldviews. When someone challenges those beliefs, it can feel like a personal attack, not just a disagreement.
  2. Tribalism: Humans naturally form groups. Politics can create an “us vs. them” mentality, where defending your side becomes a way of showing loyalty.
  3. Echo Chambers: Social media algorithms tend to show users content they already agree with. This reinforces existing beliefs and makes opposing views seem more extreme or threatening.
  4. Validation and Status: Expressing political views online can be a way to gain approval or respect from like-minded peers. It can also feel empowering to speak out, especially on controversial topics.
  5. Misinformation and Emotional Content: Political content that triggers strong emotions—anger, fear, outrage—gets more attention and shares. This fuels more reactionary and defensive behavior.
  6. Perceived Stakes: People often feel that political outcomes directly affect their rights, safety, or future. That sense of urgency makes discussions more intense.

By ChatGPT

801136325890850816

donotdestroy:

In a society in which nearly everybody is dominated by somebody else’s mind or by a disembodied mind, it becomes increasingly difficult to learn the truth about the activities of governments and corporations, about the quality or value of products, or about the health of one’s own place and economy.

In such a society, also, our private economies will depend less and less upon the private ownership of real, usable property, and more and more upon property that is institutional and abstract, beyond individual control, such as money, insurance policies, certificates of deposit, stocks, and shares. And as our private economies become more abstract, the mutual, free helps and pleasures of family and community life will be supplanted by a kind of displaced or placeless citizenship and by commerce with impersonal and self-interested suppliers…

Thus, although we are not slaves in name, and cannot be carried to market and sold as somebody else’s legal chattels, we are free only within narrow limits. For all our talk about liberation and personal autonomy, there are few choices that we are free to make. What would be the point, for example, if a majority of our people decided to be self-employed?

The great enemy of freedom is the alignment of political power with wealth. This alignment destroys the commonwealth – that is, the natural wealth of localities and the local economies of household, neighborhood, and community – and so destroys democracy, of which the commonwealth is the foundation and practical means.

— Wendell Berry

798346555642068992

White House Ballroom

ห้อง East Room ซึ่งมักถูกเรียกอย่างไม่เป็นทางการว่า “White House ballroom” — มีมาตั้งแต่ ยุคแรกของทำเนียบขาวเลยครับ

มาดูตามลำดับเวลาแบบสรุป:

🏛️ จุดเริ่มต้น

  • ค.ศ. 1792–1800: ทำเนียบขาวเริ่มสร้างในสมัยประธานาธิบดี George Washington (แต่เขาไม่เคยได้อยู่ในนั้น เพราะสร้างไม่เสร็จ)
  • ค.ศ. 1800: ประธานาธิบดี John Adams เป็นคนแรกที่ย้ายเข้าอยู่
  • ในแบบแปลนเดิมที่สถาปนิก James Hoban ออกแบบไว้ ก็มี East Room อยู่แล้ว
    👉 ดังนั้น ห้องนี้ถือกำเนิดพร้อมกับตัวอาคารดั้งเดิมของทำเนียบขาว

🕯️ ช่วงแรก ๆ (1800s)

  • ตอนแรกห้องนี้ ยังไม่ได้ตกแต่ง เพราะรัฐบาลใหม่มีงบน้อยมาก
  • Dolley Madison (ภรรยาของประธานาธิบดี James Madison) เริ่มใช้ห้องนี้จัดงานสังคมและงานเต้นรำครั้งแรก ๆ ในช่วงต้นทศวรรษ 1810
  • หลังสงครามปี 1812 (ที่อังกฤษเผาทำเนียบขาว) ห้องนี้ถูกบูรณะใหม่ในช่วงปี 1817–1829 ในสมัยประธานาธิบดี James Monroe

✨ ยุคทองของงานเลี้ยง

  • ช่วงกลางศตวรรษที่ 19 เป็นต้นมา East Room ถูกใช้สำหรับ งานเลี้ยงเต้นรำ งานแต่งงาน งานศพ และพิธีการทางการต่าง ๆ
  • ตัวอย่างเช่น
  • งานแต่งของ Alice Roosevelt (ลูกสาว Theodore Roosevelt) ปี 1906
  • งานเลี้ยงรัฐพิธี
  • การแสดงดนตรีของศิลปินชื่อดัง
  • งานเต้นรำของแขกบ้านแขกเมือง

🕰️ ปัจจุบัน

  • ห้องนี้ยังใช้อยู่ถึงปัจจุบันในฐานะ ห้องใหญ่ที่สุดของทำเนียบขาว
  • ใช้จัดงานสื่อ งานเลี้ยงรัฐพิธี งานแสดงดนตรีคลาสสิก และบางครั้งใช้รับรองแขกอย่างเป็นทางการ
  • ตกแต่งด้วยโคมไฟระย้า 3 ดวงใหญ่ พื้นไม้สีอ่อน และภาพเหมือนประธานาธิบดีหลายคน

สรุปสั้น ๆ 👇

“White House Ballroom” (หรือ East Room) มีมาตั้งแต่ ค.ศ. 1800 และเริ่มใช้สำหรับงานเลี้ยงเต้นรำ ตั้งแต่สมัยประธานาธิบดี James Madison (ราว ค.ศ. 1810s)

By ChatGPT

797800694364192768

797773892738547712

WATCH LIVE: ‘No Kings’ rally in DC on nationwide day of protests against the Trump administration

797093176883200000

796595373136297984

Illegal Voting by Non-Citizens in the U.S.: Facts, Statistics, and Context

Here’s a summary of what credible research and reporting tell us about the scale of illegal voting by non-citizens in the U.S., along with how uncertain the estimates are:

What Studies & Investigations Show

1. Very rare occurrence in practice

The Brennan Center for Justice reviewed many state investigations and court cases and found that confirmed instances of non-citizens voting are extremely rare. (Brennan Center for Justice) For example:

  • One study found only 14 convictions of non-citizens for voting over the first three years of a DOJ fraud initiative. (Brennan Center for Justice)
  • In large states or in investigations with many hundreds of thousands or millions of registered voters, the number of non-citizens found to have voted is often in double digits. (Brennan Center for Justice)

2. Specific state findings

  • In Iowa, a review found 35 non-citizens voted in the 2024 general election, out of more than 1.6 million voters. (AP News)
  • Also in Iowa, there were 277 non-citizens registered among about 2.3 million registered voters. (AP News)

These numbers are very small fractions of total voters or registrations. (AP News)

3. Claims with larger estimates, but high uncertainty

  • A study by Just Facts in 2024 claimed that 10%-27% of non-citizen adults are illegally registered to vote. (justfacts.org)
  • That estimate implies 2-5 million non-citizen adults could be registered to vote. (justfacts.org)
  • The same study projects that 5%-13% of non-citizens might illegally vote in federal elections, which translates (on their model) to 1.0 million to 2.7 million illegal votes in certain elections unless additional safeguards are in place. (justfacts.org)

But many experts caution that these larger estimates are highly uncertain because of small sample sizes, potential misreporting, issues identifying non-citizens vs. naturalized citizens, and methodological challenges. (Snopes)

What to Keep in Mind: Limitations & Context

  • “Registered non-citizen” ≠ “non-citizen who voted”

Being on a voter registration roll doesn’t always mean someone actually voted. Some studies estimate registration but not actual votes. (justfacts.org)

  • Misidentification & data errors

Some people report they’re non-citizens but later naturalize, or there are errors in matching names/records. Some investigations turn up registrations attributed to “non-citizens” that actually were already citizens or that there was no proof the person voted. (AP News)

  • Extremely small impact

Even in studies that find non-citizen voting, it’s almost always so small in number that it is not considered to affect the outcome of elections in a meaningful way. (Brennan Center for Justice)

Bottom Line

  • Illegal voting by non-citizens does happen but confirmed cases are very rare.
  • Estimations that suggest high numbers (millions) are disputed and involve big uncertainties.
  • In most states and most elections, the fraction of votes cast by non-citizens is so small that it’s negligible in terms of impact.

796593858558443520

“Griffin said in a press conference that such arrests and charges are ‘rarities’ and ‘not a persistent problem,’ but that his office is committed to protecting the integrity of Arkansas elections. He created an Election Integrity Unit in his office’s Special Investigations Division in March 2023.”

According to the article:

They voted illegally because none of them were U.S. citizens, which makes it against Arkansas election law to register or vote in any election. Two of them also falsely attested to being U.S. citizens on their voter registration forms, which led to additional perjury charges.

Here’s what’s mentioned about which party they voted for:

Zlata Risley (from Kazakhstan) — accused of voting illegally in the 2024 Republican primary.

Chi Baum (from Nigeria) — told investigators she voted Republican in the 2024 general election, even though she wasn’t registered as a Republican.

Cecilia Castellanos (from Cuba) — voted in the 2024 general election, but the article does not specify which party she voted for.

796414755470442496

Learn how to change a DNS server in this step-by-step guide. We cover Windows, Mac, and router DNS changes, plus troubleshooting tips & more.

796335917731364864

795681242396884992

“President Donald Trump on Sunday said tech and media giants Larry Ellison, Michael Dell, and Lachlan and Rupert Murdoch will be a part of the group to take over TikTok’s algorithm in the acquisition of the social media platform’s US operations.”

795564019606011904

Jimmy Kimmel is Back!

795145349142560768

Democrats and KKK history

  • The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) was founded in 1865 in Tennessee by former Confederate soldiers after the U.S. Civil War. Its original purpose was to resist Reconstruction and maintain white supremacy in the South.
  • At that time, the Democratic Party was dominant in the South and was the party most associated with opposing Reconstruction, civil rights for freed Black people, and the Republican-led federal government (since Republicans were the party of Lincoln and emancipation).
  • Because of this, many early KKK members were white Southern Democrats. The Klan often worked to suppress Black voters, who overwhelmingly supported Republicans in that era.
  • However, it would be misleading to say “the Democratic Party created the KKK.” The Klan was not an official arm of the Democratic Party—it was a violent, secret society. But it did align with the interests of many Southern Democrats at the time.
  • Over the decades, political alignments shifted. In the mid-20th century, the Democratic Party (especially under presidents like Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, and Lyndon B. Johnson) embraced civil rights. Meanwhile, many segregationist white Southerners moved toward the Republican Party.

Summary:
The KKK was created by white Southerners, many of whom were Democrats in the post-Civil War era, but it was never formally created or run by the Democratic Party. Over time, the party positions on race and civil rights changed dramatically, so the historical connections don’t map neatly onto today’s politics.

1 2 3 4 9