Style often helps categorize and define art, making it easier for people to understand and discuss different periods, techniques, and themes in art history. Without a recognizable style, art can become more challenging to classify. However, this does not mean that art without a defined style lacks value or meaning. It just means that it may not fit neatly into the traditional frameworks that we’ve created for understanding art.
In the absence of a specific style, art may be categorized by other criteria, like the concepts behind the work, its intentions, or even its context (social, political, or cultural). For instance, conceptual art is categorized by the ideas it expresses rather than the visual style itself. Similarly, installation art might focus more on how the work interacts with space and the viewer than on the style of its execution.
In some ways, art without style challenges the idea that all art must be categorized in a specific way. It opens up a broader interpretation, where the meaning and impact of the art can come from its message or experience rather than its form.
Do you find this lack of style freeing, or do you think art needs some form of structure to be appreciated?
An art movement is a style or trend in art that is followed by a group of artists during a specific period. These movements often share common techniques, themes, or philosophies. They can be influenced by historical events, cultural shifts, or technological advancements.
For example:
Impressionism (late 19th century) focused on capturing light and everyday life with loose brushwork.
Surrealism (20th century) explored dreams and the unconscious mind with strange, dreamlike imagery.
Abstract Expressionism (mid-20th century) emphasized spontaneous and emotional brushstrokes rather than realistic representation.
Art movements help categorize different styles and ideas in art history. Do you have a particular movement you’re interested in?
“You have to learn to be human first… before you can learn art.” — Silpa Bhirasri
This sentence conveys the idea that art is not just a technical skill or creative ability, but also something that deals with deep humanity, such as emotions, thoughts, spirit, experiences, and moral values. If an artist lacks an understanding of humanity—such as empathy, understanding the complexities of life, or having a broad and deep perspective—the art created may lack the true meaning of the dimension.
“Learning to be human” here can mean many things, such as:
Understanding oneself and one’s own emotions
Understanding society, culture, and history
Recognizing the suffering and joy of others
Developing empathy and ethical awareness
Great art often comes from communicating humanity on a deep level, whether it’s pain, hope, love, or the changes in life. Therefore, this sentence may serve as a reminder that art practice should not only be based on technique, but also on understanding life and humanity.
