politics

129 items found

802663356168388608

donotdestroy:

Politics on Social Media

People often talk about politics and defend or attack political beliefs—especially on social media—because politics is deeply tied to identity, values, and a sense of belonging. Here are a few reasons why it happens so often and so emotionally:

  1. Identity and Belonging: Political beliefs often align with core values and worldviews. When someone challenges those beliefs, it can feel like a personal attack, not just a disagreement.
  2. Tribalism: Humans naturally form groups. Politics can create an “us vs. them” mentality, where defending your side becomes a way of showing loyalty.
  3. Echo Chambers: Social media algorithms tend to show users content they already agree with. This reinforces existing beliefs and makes opposing views seem more extreme or threatening.
  4. Validation and Status: Expressing political views online can be a way to gain approval or respect from like-minded peers. It can also feel empowering to speak out, especially on controversial topics.
  5. Misinformation and Emotional Content: Political content that triggers strong emotions—anger, fear, outrage—gets more attention and shares. This fuels more reactionary and defensive behavior.
  6. Perceived Stakes: People often feel that political outcomes directly affect their rights, safety, or future. That sense of urgency makes discussions more intense.

By ChatGPT

801521595568029696

ตื่นมาก็โพสต์บ่นตั้งแต่เช้าจนถึงก่อนนอนทุกวัน แต่กลับไม่เห็นการลงมือทำอะไรที่ช่วยให้บ้านเมืองดีขึ้นเลย

801136618643783680

donotdestroy:

Politics on Social Media

People often talk about politics and defend or attack political beliefs—especially on social media—because politics is deeply tied to identity, values, and a sense of belonging. Here are a few reasons why it happens so often and so emotionally:

  1. Identity and Belonging: Political beliefs often align with core values and worldviews. When someone challenges those beliefs, it can feel like a personal attack, not just a disagreement.
  2. Tribalism: Humans naturally form groups. Politics can create an “us vs. them” mentality, where defending your side becomes a way of showing loyalty.
  3. Echo Chambers: Social media algorithms tend to show users content they already agree with. This reinforces existing beliefs and makes opposing views seem more extreme or threatening.
  4. Validation and Status: Expressing political views online can be a way to gain approval or respect from like-minded peers. It can also feel empowering to speak out, especially on controversial topics.
  5. Misinformation and Emotional Content: Political content that triggers strong emotions—anger, fear, outrage—gets more attention and shares. This fuels more reactionary and defensive behavior.
  6. Perceived Stakes: People often feel that political outcomes directly affect their rights, safety, or future. That sense of urgency makes discussions more intense.

By ChatGPT

801136325890850816

donotdestroy:

In a society in which nearly everybody is dominated by somebody else’s mind or by a disembodied mind, it becomes increasingly difficult to learn the truth about the activities of governments and corporations, about the quality or value of products, or about the health of one’s own place and economy.

In such a society, also, our private economies will depend less and less upon the private ownership of real, usable property, and more and more upon property that is institutional and abstract, beyond individual control, such as money, insurance policies, certificates of deposit, stocks, and shares. And as our private economies become more abstract, the mutual, free helps and pleasures of family and community life will be supplanted by a kind of displaced or placeless citizenship and by commerce with impersonal and self-interested suppliers…

Thus, although we are not slaves in name, and cannot be carried to market and sold as somebody else’s legal chattels, we are free only within narrow limits. For all our talk about liberation and personal autonomy, there are few choices that we are free to make. What would be the point, for example, if a majority of our people decided to be self-employed?

The great enemy of freedom is the alignment of political power with wealth. This alignment destroys the commonwealth – that is, the natural wealth of localities and the local economies of household, neighborhood, and community – and so destroys democracy, of which the commonwealth is the foundation and practical means.

— Wendell Berry

797319163878277120

donotdestroy:

“The greatest illusion the middle class holds is that they can ‘fix’ poverty from the outside, without ever understanding the lived experience of those within it.”

— Anonymous

795564019606011904

Jimmy Kimmel is Back!

795145349142560768

Democrats and KKK history

  • The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) was founded in 1865 in Tennessee by former Confederate soldiers after the U.S. Civil War. Its original purpose was to resist Reconstruction and maintain white supremacy in the South.
  • At that time, the Democratic Party was dominant in the South and was the party most associated with opposing Reconstruction, civil rights for freed Black people, and the Republican-led federal government (since Republicans were the party of Lincoln and emancipation).
  • Because of this, many early KKK members were white Southern Democrats. The Klan often worked to suppress Black voters, who overwhelmingly supported Republicans in that era.
  • However, it would be misleading to say “the Democratic Party created the KKK.” The Klan was not an official arm of the Democratic Party—it was a violent, secret society. But it did align with the interests of many Southern Democrats at the time.
  • Over the decades, political alignments shifted. In the mid-20th century, the Democratic Party (especially under presidents like Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, and Lyndon B. Johnson) embraced civil rights. Meanwhile, many segregationist white Southerners moved toward the Republican Party.

Summary:
The KKK was created by white Southerners, many of whom were Democrats in the post-Civil War era, but it was never formally created or run by the Democratic Party. Over time, the party positions on race and civil rights changed dramatically, so the historical connections don’t map neatly onto today’s politics.

1 2 3 4 19